When you get to a certain age, you find yourself trying to explain your history to the generation that’s coming after you. You think if you can do this, it will help them make sense of the stages of life as they pass through. It may even help you make sense of your own life.
So you begin by giving them basic information. In my case, it goes like this: “I grew up in Rochester, New York in the 1960s and ’70s.” The younger generation looks at me and says, “Oh yeah, the ’60s. We know what that was like.” And their eyes glaze over.
Continue reading

News to the Senate
If you really want to understand an issue, find a newspaper reporter, sit him or her in a bar and start buying beer. In 30 minutes, she or he will lay the whole thing out for you with astonishing clarity. Now, why they fail to explain things so clearly when they sit down to write their stories is a mystery. I used to be a newspaper reporter and I was a victim of the same disease. Part of my mission here at Soapbox is to try to atone for those sins of years long ago by bringing some clarity to the news. This week’s topic is the comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty. Ready? Here we go.
On a political level, this whole debate is about the Republicans in the Senate trying to embarrass the president. The U.S. signed the test ban treaty more than two years ago, but the Senate has never ratified it. Among other things, the Republicans don’t want to let Bill Clinton claim the treaty as an accomplishment of his administration. But denying Clinton a victory wasn’t good enough. Trent Lott and company decided to rub the president’s nose in it, so they brought the treaty to the Senate floor without warning, in a sneak attack and figure they can vote it down before the White House has a chance to drum up support for ratification.
Continue reading »