I’m on Rick Santorum’s side – in a narrow, limited sense. The former senator from Pennsylvania is not my kind of politician. There may be a few issues on which we agree, but I’m not inclined to seek them out.
That said, Mr. Santorum meets the qualifications to run for president of the United States. He’s a native-born American over the age of 35. His candidacy should succeed or fail based on the number of voters who think he’s best fit to serve in the Oval Office and only on that basis.
That, however, is not what happened in Iowa. This morning, the Des Moines Register broke the news that rather than losing the Iowa caucuses by eight votes to former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, Mr. Santorum actually won them by at least 34 votes.
I have to write “at least” because the Iowa Republican Party claims the votes from eight precincts have been irretrievably lost. Due to this, the official word on the caucuses is that it was a “tie” between Messrs. Santorum and Romney. It wasn’t a tie on Caucus night; it was a “win” for Mr. Romney. How is an eight-vote margin a “win” and a 34-vote (at least) margin a tie? (Hint: It’s a “tie” when you’re trying to throw the election to Mr. Romney.) Continue reading

For the Record
Late in the day last Thursday, federal Judge J. Garvan Murtha ruled the Vermont legislature cannot intervene in the continued operation of the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant.
In his 102-page ruling, Judge Murtha closely tracks the arguments made by attorneys for Entergy, the owner of Vermont Yankee. Entergy argued and the judge agreed that while the statute passed by the legislature says that the state’s concerns about Vermont Yankee are based on issues of reliability and economic benefit, the legislators were really concerned with radiological safety and such safety is the sole province of the Nuclear regulatory Commission (NRC), which last year issued a permit for Vermont Yankee to operate for another 20 years.
(The plant’s reactor, which is the same design as the melted reactors at Fukushima, has been running for 40 years, which was the projected lifetime of the reactor when it was built. Since 2006, it has been running at 120 percent of its design capacity, again with the blessing of the NRC.)
Continue reading »