Call Me Charley

I must have been in fifth or sixth grade when we were assigned to read “Call Me Charley,” by Jesse Jackson. Not that Jesse Jackson, but Mr. Jackson the author was an African American and “Call Me Charley” is about an African American youth trying to fit into a white community.

Mr. Jackson said he didn’t write the book to create teachable moments about race relations. He wrote it, he said, to reflect his life experiences because he hadn’t seen books about people like him.

Regardless of his intentions, the book was widely read in white suburban schools in the late Civil Rights Era when I grew up.

It’s been almost 40 years since I read “Call Me Charley,” but I remember (or think I remember) it pretty well. Charley is a friendly, mild-mannered African American teen who has just moved with his family to a white suburb. Charley is eager to make new friends but most of the white kids and adults have problems with him being who he is.
Continue reading »

Withholding Consent

During last week’s Fourth of July festivities, it occurred to me that the celebration of our nation’s founding commemorates a political act. We could reasonably date the founding of the United States to the battle of Lexington and Concord or the battle of Saratoga or the battle of Yorktown. It’s true America was born in a clash of arms and shedding of blood.

There are many people today, some of them the governor of Alaska for the next two weeks, who spit the word “Congress” out of their mouths as if it was a piece of burnt toast. They should remember that the first words of the Declaration of Independence are “In Congress, July 4, 1776.”

That’s right, a bunch of guys sitting around in a room, talking, but talking on behalf of people ranged up and down the east coast. As the document says, governments derive their just powers from consent of the governed. (And to be honest, in those days “the governed” was defined as white men who owned property.)
Continue reading »

The Children’s Table

Are you planning a huge barbecue for the Fourth of July? Will it be in the backyard? (The kids are hoping for a pool.) Will it be at a state park or beach? (Send the teens early to hold down a grill and several picnic tables.)

Wherever it happens, if the crowd is large enough, you’ll notice some age-based segregation. The old folks will sit in lawn chairs in the shade and visit. The teenagers will disappear. The bulk of the work will fall to the parents in their 20s and 30s. Some will keep the small children supervised while the others work the grills and set out the cold salads.

Of course, there’s the children’s table. Park all those first cousins together and let rules about table manners slide for one day or at least pretend not to notice. The kids can dash back to their play and the adults can eat in peace.

All of this depends on not being rained out, which is a mighty big depends if you live in the northeast. It’s been a very rainy spring this year and is in fact overcast and muggy as I type. (Great word, “muggy.” Just typing it makes me feel damp.)
Continue reading »

Joe Biden Date Night

Barack Obama is causing me trouble. Me, personally.

The president and first lady are making a habit – a very public habit – of reserving one night a week for a date. Marriage maintenance is important for couples who’ve been together a while, especially if they have kids and the day job demands plenty of attention and energy.

So, it’s great to see the first couple going out to eat or catching a Broadway play. (Some of the Obamas’ opponents have sniped that the Broadway excursion cost the taxpayers money. They’re right. It did. What did those many long weekends in Crawford cost? Why didn’t those same people mention that?)

So I think it’s great the example-setters-in-chief are seen holding hands and making time for each other. On these warm, early-summer nights, it’s nice for Adrienne and I to take an evening stroll along the lakeside, maybe stop for a creamee. (That’s Vermont vernacular for soft-serve ice cream.)
Continue reading »

Act Accordingly

There are two ways of relating to government: 1) I think my government is acting in my best interest – and act accordingly or 2) I think my government is not acting in my best interest – and act accordingly.

Most of us fall between 1) and 2). I was closer to 2) for eight years and acted accordingly. Finally, those actions – combined with actions by millions of my fellow citizens – have brought me closer to 1). Millions of others who were 1)s for eight years are now 2)s. Some of those people have guns and have turned to tragic acts of terrorism in recent weeks.

In Iran, the country has been heading one way for the last 30 years, although the momentum picked up significantly in the last four years. People finally drifted much close to 2) than 1) and acted accordingly, they came out and – apparently – voted for a change in direction. Change did not take place and the result of that failure to change is leaking out of Iran, despite the regime’s best efforts to slap a lid on communication technology.
Continue reading »

Boneheads with Guns

This week, the National Rifle Association appealed to the Supreme Court a ruling that upholds Chicago’s ban on the ownership of handguns. A year ago, the court ruled that the District of Columbia couldn’t ban handgun ownership. The district, however, is a federal colony and the court’s ruling applied to federal law. The Chicago ban is state law and the Illinois appeals court ruled that state law can be narrower than federal law. (A federal court in San Francisco ruled the other way. It said Second Amendment rights couldn’t be abridged by state law.)

I support the Second Amendment, but I don’t think it is a carte blanche for owning assault rifles or armor-piercing bullets. I think there’s nothing wrong with background checks and cooling-off periods. Or, for that matter, with local handgun bans.

Why? Because I read the papers (or their on-line equivalents). Here are a couple items from Vermont and beyond.

– A 73-year-old retired college professor was shot to death as he sat eating dinner with his wife. The culprits – so far two have been charged – were boneheads with guns who set up their own back yard shooting range 750 feet from the professor’s home. The weapon that killed the prof was – you guessed it – an assault rifle that one of the men, Brad Lussier, fired several times without aiming.

For those of you who may have missed it, Brad Lussier decided to fire an assault weapon without aiming in a residential neighborhood, killing an innocent bystander and forcing his wife to watch her husband die before her eyes.
Continue reading »

Tuesday Night in a Small Room

Tuesday, the first day back to work after the holiday weekend and The English Beat was playing at Higher Ground. Dave Rap, my former colleague, calls and says we should go to the show because Dave Wakeling, another former colleague, leads the band.

(In the early ‘90s, Dave Wakeling worked for Greenpeace on the west coast, encouraging celebrities to donate some of their star power to environmental issues. Dave Rap and I worked for Greenpeace on the east coast, on the considerably-less-than-glamorous toxics campaign.)

I knew the English Beat from the radio 30 years ago, but I never really followed the band. Now Dave Rap and I were leaning against the bar at the back of a converted movie theater, one third full of middle-aged white people watching a warm-up band whose name I never did catch.
Continue reading »