All Politics Is Local

It’s winter in Vermont, although it’s been in the 40’s for most of the season, there’s no snow on the ground and my neighbor, Tom, is moping about the house. He has a new collapsible ice shanty, auger and tip-ups sitting in his basement unused, because the ice on Lake Champlain (what there is of it) is not thick enough to support ice fishing.

So we distract ourselves in other ways. Town meeting falls on March 7 this year. For most Vermont towns, it means a day-long discussion of town business at the town hall, punctuated by a dish-to-pass lunch. There are too many people (40,000) in Burlington for us all to gather in one spot, so we just vote at our ward polling places.

The mayor’s seat is open for the first time in over a decade and five candidates are running. There’s a Republican, Democrat and a Progressive. In Burlington, Progressives are not a “third party,” they’ve controlled the mayor’s office for all but two of the past 25 years. There are also two independent candidates, whose primary function is to provide comic relief at campaign events. One vowed to solve the city’s financial woes by going to Iraq “to get some of those bundles of money I saw the troops throwing around like footballs on TV.” Whatever, dude.
Continue reading »

The Man Who Wasn’t There

Salon magazine published another round of photos from the Abu Ghraib torture scandal that broke in the spring of 2004. One photo is of the body of Manadel al-Jamadi. One eye is open, fixed and glassy; the other purple and swollen shut. A bloody bandage rests on the side of his face. According to the photo’s caption, Mr. al-Jamadi died in CIA custody at Abu Ghraib. There was no official record of his imprisonment. He was a man who wasn’t there, who came into existence only after he died.

Another photo shows a man who was, according to a report by the Army’s Criminal Investigation Command, “mentally deranged” and “required special restraints due to his behavior.” Indeed, the man’s wrists and ankles and bound, but he is nonetheless shown inserting an object into his anus. We don’t know why he’s sodomizing himself – is it because he’s deranged, or did U.S. troops force him to do it? They certainly didn’t stop him, choosing instead to take a photo, which was then passed around until it became part of the investigation.

A third photo is a wider shot of the famous image of the hooded man standing on the box with electrodes attached to his fingers. The new image shows Staff Sgt. Ivan “Chip” Frederick off to the side, nonchalantly clipping his fingernails. Spc. Sabrina Harman, who put the electrodes on the man’s fingers, told investigators, “I was joking with him and told him if he fell off he would be electrocuted.” Some joke, what fun.
Continue reading »

Catastrophic Gradualism

I was browsing in a second-hand bookstore recently, brooding as I browsed on the current state of society. My eye fell on a volume of essays by George Orwell titled, “In Front of Your Nose.” It seemed liked such a deliberate response to my thoughts that I bought it.

In an October 1945 essay called “You and the Atom Bomb,” Orwell coins the term “cold war” to describe a heavily armed nation that, while it cannot be conquered, is also permanently hostile to other countries. Sound familiar?

In another essay, Orwell exhibits his sharp eye for linguistic trends by stating that we cannot “put everything right by watching our navels in California.” The name of that essay is “Catastrophic Gradualism.”

“According to this theory,” Orwell writes, “nothing is ever achieved without bloodshed, lies, tyranny and injustice, but on the other hand, no considerable change for the better is to be expected as the result of even the greatest upheaval.”
Continue reading »

Time of Our Choosing

Three years ago Sunday, Colin Powell made his famous appearance before the UN Security Council. Mr. Powell still maintains he did not lie that day, because he did not know that what he was saying was untrue, but it was untrue just the same.

While Mr. Powell was destroying his reputation in New York, the bellicose members of the Bush administration – Cheney and Rice, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz and Feith – were strutting in Washington, bragging about how we would bring war to Iraq “at a time of our choosing.” I remember being struck by the arrogance of the phrase. It had a Biblical feel – judgment is coming; only God knows the day and the hour. In this case, the role of God was played by the George W. Bush, who, by his own account, is quite friendly with The Man Himself.

Judgment Day didn’t work as planned. Now Don Rumsfeld argues with his generals through the media about whether the army is or is not broken. Meanwhile, the “time of our choosing” phrase has re-emerged. White House Spokesman Scott McClellan, refusing Osama bin Laden’s offer of a truce a few weeks ago, said, “The terrorists started this war and the president has made it clear that we will end it at a time and place of our choosing.” When, Scott? Where?
Continue reading »

In The Barn?

Jingos are fond of quoting (misquoting, actually) Stephen Decatur’s famous toast: “My country, right or wrong.” G.K. Chesterton compared that sentiment to: “My mother, drunk or sober.”

Our country is currently wrong and our president is drunk with power the founding fathers never meant him to have. Commodore Decatur was right, however, it is our country and if the needle is ever going to move back from “wrong” to “right,” we’ll have to be the ones to move it.

America’s journey to rectitude could begin from any of a dozen points, but let’s look at the still-unfolding warrantless wiretap scandal. In December the New York Times (after sitting on the story for a year) revealed that in 2001 George Bush authorized the National Security Agency (NSA) to use its surveillance devices to monitor telephone calls and e-mails either placed to or originating from the U.S., in direct violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
Continue reading »

Now and Again

The illegal detention of prisoners at the naval base in Guantanamo, Cuba is one of several blemishes on the face of America’s international image. Many commentators have remarked on the shame George W. Bush’s concentration camps have brought to this nation – and they’re right. Many of these commentators have unfavorably compared Mr. Bush to his father who, they say, would never have allowed such violations of U.S. international law – and they’re wrong.

It isn’t often mentioned in the current debate – perhaps because doing so would be a backhanded admission that reporters failed to do their jobs 15 years ago – but our 41st president, George H.W. Bush, used Guantanamo Bay as a prison camp for people who were seized without due process of law and held, under brutal conditions with repeated violations of the civil right, for years without access to attorneys and courts.
Continue reading »

What You’re Paying For

George Bush gave a speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars this week, attacking critics who say he went to war in Iraq for oil. Mr. Bush says his invasion was to spread democracy.

“Dictatorships seem orderly,” he said. “When one man makes all the decisions, there is no need for negotiation or compromise. Democracies are sometimes messy and seemingly chaotic, as different parties advance competing agendas and seek their share of political power. We’ve seen this throughout our own history. We’ve seen this in other democracies around the world.”

What does Mr. Bush see in China? On New Year’s Eve, Microsoft Network (MSN) shut down a web site operated by Zhao Jing, also known as Michael Anti. Mr. Zhao posted comments protesting the firing of three editors of the Beijing News. In China, where there is no democracy, journalists are fired for deviating from the government line and bloggers who call attention to it have their web sites shut down – by the American companies that host them.
Continue reading »